🎰 Pokerbook : biayna.ru - biayna.ru

Well, you say you've reported the books to Amazon, so do let us know if you hear anything specific, meaning more than the usual boilerplate letter they send to us about any question we tender. The books you cite from the also-bought listing are there because other customers bought them; that's the same on any other sales page. You can argue that the books are insipid and lack any real value or content, and I don't think you'd get much disagreement. Don't give up.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} Obviously, others may feel differently. But are they fake? As to the reviewers, maybe they are fake, maybe they're not. I know you are plenty upset; I don't blame you. Taking the books themselves and their reviewers out of the equation, we're left only with your own assurance of fakery, but your proof is that "everyone knows it. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}A little harsh with the Salamander, weren't you? Cheats prosper. Thanks for your message. In fact, going by the bios, the writers, though lacking academic achievements, bring more to the table in terms of experience than do the dozens of self-help hopefuls who post links to their books in the forum every week. The only thing about one of the books you linked that I didn't like was keyword stuffing, but that's a problem across all genres on Amazon. I don't see anything sinister in it, especially since it's sales driven and posted by Amazon itself. As for using the word "hatred," I believe you are not a native English speaker am I right? I have no idea and saw nothing to make me take that leap. I followed the links you posted, but didn't find anything at the other end but the kind of short publications we call them scamphlets that are quickly written often by ghosts and target very specific, often-underserved nonfiction niches. As to the names, most customers don't post under their real names; the most "prolific" reviewer is Amazon Customer. Try "ire" or "discomfort," or well, you get the idea. Most reviews on Amazon are just a line or two, and I'm not surprised when I see that someone who wrote a review about some get-rich-quick-scheme or get-fit-fad has read and reviewed others in the same and related genres. How about that fake restaurant that was ginned up to be No. They are opportunistic and shallow, but not much different than any other self-help book written by an unknown. I like reporters; I used to be one. Unfortunately, as others have noted, there is not much to be done. Or even that they've read several in a short period -- none of them take more than an hour to read, most a lot less.